| 
        
          | 
            
              | 
 |  
              |   | Business needs and social good are in synergy |  
              | 
 |  
              
                | 
                  
                    Sajid Ahmed | 13 Sep, 2016
                      |   |  
                      |  |  
                      | 
                   
                    | 
                      
                        | Top Stories |  |  |  
                    |  |  |  You want to help. Your heart is in the right place. You come with a 
pedigree. You are talented. You want to live with a spirit of generosity
 and integrity. Now what?
 
 First, we must accept and concede that 
the technology to feed, cure, educate, transport and sustain 1.3 billion
 Indians does not exist yet. We cannot declare victory on a social 
cause. All we can hope for is to keep shifting the equilibrium through a
 series of small upgrades.
 
 The pivotal challenge is to decide on 
the best ways to accomplish these upgrades -- access to food, water, 
healthcare, safety, dignity and freedom. Where do we look for solutions?
 So far, we have found hope in the energy and enthusiasm of 
non-governmental organisations (NGOs), gracious government programmes, 
generous philanthropists, and other noble social outfits. Their abundant
 generosity has seen a consistent rise paralleling India's economic 
growth. This has not translated into the results we hoped for, at least 
not at the pace we expected.
 
 Whether you are an individual or an 
established social organisation, a corporate management approach to 
charity can help organise and simplify the process.
 
 India is home
 to the largest number of registered NGOs. The heroic efforts of the 
government's various projects like village outreach and childhood 
education initiatives are admirable. Social organisations are at the 
forefront of both social welfare and social reform. The altruism of our 
movie stars and cricketers eclipses their performances on the screen and
 the field. Yet, progress is neither proportionally fast nor sustainable
 because the cycle of fundraising has to be repeated periodically with 
unpredictable results, with no resources to scale. Scale is what 
business does best.
 
 Many see business as the problem rather than a
 solution. Think of banking, the drug industry, the fast-food industry, 
the furniture industry or any other kind of manufacturing and you can 
see the justification for this attitude. Greed and exploitation mark 
most people's perceptions of business operations -- but that is a gross 
distortion of the role of business. It is true that profit motivates 
businesses to create resources. All wealth is created by business and 
only business can create, sustain and scale resources. It is this very 
repetition and scalability that moves the mass of humanity forward.
 
 Donations,
 subsidies and exemptions can never be enough to solve extreme poverty. 
Moreover, it is disheartening that we tend to turn a blind eye towards 
the results after we receive our tax exemptions and accolades. 
Programmes like Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which urge 
businesses to give more and get more involved in social issues, have 
started yielding benefits in finite silos. For all its limitations, a 
business solution to social issues is the only self-sustaining one and 
by far the fastest one, considering that the cost of improving lives in 
India is startlingly low compared to other countries.
 
 Far from 
being out of sync with each other, business needs and social good are in
 synergy. Lacking is the knowledge and awareness on ways to address 
social issues with a business model. Business owners must take the 
responsibility of good fortune and see themselves as agents of change 
and see philanthropy as the market for love and care. The most effective
 changes so far have come from partnerships between NGOs, governments 
and businesses to collaborate and share knowledge and techniques to 
scale.
 
 The activist Dan Pallotta urges that in addition to 
businesses seeing themselves in a new light, the rest of us also need to
 look at non-profits differently, letting go of our many biases 
concerning their management.
 
 Making money in the non-profit 
sector is uncomfortable for many. While we understand completely the 
need to make money in the for-profit sector, we treat the pursuits of 
doing well for oneself and doing well for the needy as mutually 
exclusive. Why is that?
 
 Another bias is our stringent intolerance
 of operational costs and overheads in the use of our charity money. 
Advertising and marketing are as important in the non-profit sector as 
in the for-profit sector; yet our attitude becomes tight-fisted when we 
hear of money spent on promoting non-profits. How else will a non-profit
 raise awareness and donations?
 
 Overhead costs have long been 
cursed for taking a percentage away from actual charity, but there is no
 distinction between the two. When we stop looking at overheads and 
start looking at impact, we realise that overheads allow charities to 
scale. Without overheads, charities would only have the seed capital 
collected from donations. Fundraising is an overhead and it allows 
charities to multiply seed capital.
 
 Lastly, innovation in the 
non-profit sector is curbed because failure can put your character into 
question. Prohibiting failure kills innovation. An encouragement to take
 risks can generate new revenue ideas just like in the for-profit 
sector.
 
 Our ability to solve social ills has not kept pace with 
our ability to create them. We need business leadership to step up in 
finding a cause and to support it consistently, because sustainable 
funding is a problem for all non-profits. As with any new venture, a 
savvy investment is one that yields maximum impact. Corporations can 
encourage accountability by requesting annual reports from the charities
 they support -- and then measure effectiveness and impact, giving 
priority to numbers.
 
 Corporations will have to take the 
entrepreneurial risk to fuse business and social issues. We need leaders
 who understand the new reality, and are audacious enough to break the 
mould of traditional thinking, to use the scientific method to test new 
ideas for social change and, above all, to use reason and empathy.
 
 (Sajid Ahmed, is Director, Hamdard Laboratories India. The views expressed are personal.)
 |  
                    |  |  
                |  |  
                |  |              
               |  |              
               |  |  
              |  |              
  |  |  |  | 
          
            |  |  
            |  |  
                |  |  
            | 
              
                | Customs Exchange Rates |  
                | Currency | Import | Export |  
                | US Dollar 
 | ₹88.70 
 | ₹87 |  
                | UK Pound 
 | ₹119.90 
 | ₹116 |  
                | Euro 
 | ₹104.25 
 | ₹100.65 |  
                | Japanese 
                  Yen | ₹59.20 | ₹57.30 |  
                | As on 30 Oct, 2025 |  |  
            |  |  
            | 
    
      | Daily Poll |  
      | 
          
            |  |  |  
            | Who do you think will benefit more from the India - UK FTA in the long run? |  |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            | 
                  
                    | 
                      
                        | Commented Stories |  |  |  
                    |  |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  
            |  |  |