SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • CRISIL reaffirms strong credit ratings for Adani Group firms  • India ranks 2nd on national index score among 29 countries: Report  • Tokyo stocks end lower as strong Yen weighs on exporters  • India’s real estate sector growth outlook firms up: Report  • Digitalization demands: compliance challenge for MSMEs 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

NorthEast.9.thmb.jpg To Look East, India must first transform its northeast

NorthEast.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» Indian startups raise $9.2 bn VC funding during Jan-Oct: Report
» ESIC working on convergence with AB-PMJAY; will benefit 14.43 Cr beneficiaries: Centre
» Indian Railways rakes in Rs 12,159 crore from festive rush
» BJP-led NDA’s resounding assembly election wins to push economic reforms
» Centre plans to invest Rs 9.1 lakh crore for expanding electricity network
Rajiv Dogra | 13 Jun, 2013

Every time there is a prime ministerial visit to East or Southeast Asia, we dust up the two-decade-old placards and begin to wave them. The fading lettering on them proclaims that India is 'Looking East.' But as a nation, our attention span is limited. Therefore, the moment the visit is over we climb up tiredly into the attic to deposit the placards and to keep them there till the next visit.

We spend the interregnum understanding the next move by Pakistan or China. Sometimes, the US and even Russia sneak into our national radar. But, otherwise, we are so preoccupied with ourselves and our constantly breaking stories that the world hardly figures in our view. Perhaps this is good. Perhaps, this keeps the world guessing about our grand strategy.

In one such recent attempt timed with the prime minister's Japan visit, an Australian academic Sandy Gordon suggested, "India's Look East policy was initiated out of failure: the failure of India's Cold War strategy of 'playing both ends against the middle' while at the same time attempting to adopt a pro-Soviet 'tilt'; and the failure of India's command economy, which by 1990 had managed to command only 0.4 per cent of world trade - insufficient to cushion India from the 1989-90 oil shock. While the collapse of the Soviet Union was no fault of India, it left New Delhi searching for an alternative set of economic and strategic approaches. The 'Look East' policy seemed to fit both needs."

Gordon may have his reasons for the assertion, "India's Look East policy was initiated out of failure..." but had he cared to look deeper into history his conclusion may have been different. If he had travelled to Bali or to Angkor Vat he may have been reminded of ancient India's intimate Look East connections; links that date back to the 9th century and based largely on trade and peaceful population shift.

But why make him go back all the way? If he had revisited the time of the World War II, he would certainly have heard the war cries of Subhas Chandra Bose's Indian National Army (INA) that took up arms on the side of the Japanese army. Some recent commentaries have described that as one of the toughest challenges that the British faced during the war. Is it a mere coincidence that the INA's battles were fought in the northeast and further down in the areas that constitute much of what might be covered now under our Look East criteria?

In fact we don't even remind the Japanese about the bold stand taken in their favour at the War Crimes Tribunal by Justice Radha Binod Pal. But then, reminding others goes against our grain. Had that been otherwise, we would have built permanent bridges with the East through our Buddhist connection. After all Rome, for all practical purposes, has become synonymous with Christianity. So too are the examples from elsewhere. Are we then simply self-effacing, or plain and simple deficient in the follow through?

What happens, for example, to the declarations of doubling or tripling trade that are routinely made during the pime ministerial visits? Are they implemented just as vigorously? Had that been the case, and if they were seriously followed through, we would surely have left China far behind as the biggest trading nation in the world. Whereas the fact is that we are running a current account deficit that may lash us against the rocks of IMF scrutiny of the type we faced in 1991. Basically, our problem is red tape coated with inertia, a desire that the fruit must somehow fall into our laps.

But what about our latest claims: is the prognosis rosier after the recent visit by the prime minister? Alas, it may not be so. If the lynchpin of our Look East policy is the connectivity through the northeast, then we are talking of three possible linkages by air, road and rail. None among them is functional as yet between India's northeast and the eastern part of Asia. Nor is it likely to be so in the foreseeable future.

The uncomfortable fact is the dismal state of infrastructure in the northeast itself. The airports there are hardly world class; their connectivity within the region and with the rest of the country is just functional. The current state of its roads can barely sustain the passenger traffic; how can its potholes survive the pressure of heavy traffic? And the rail network largely remains as it was during the British times.

Still, if we were to somehow transform this infrastructure into one capable of moving millions of tonnes of cargo, will it mean that we have finally delivered on our Look East promise? Sadly, that will just be a beginning. To give Look East real meaning, there has to be a vast traffic of goods both ways. As of now, we do not have even a single major industrial unit in the area. Unless that happens, and till major industries come up in the northeast, we would have very little to export. We will merely be making promises during high-level visits. And over time, the intended audience may just stop taking us seriously.

Can't we then take a cue from our ancient success? Then, we were able to create multiple linkages; people, trade and ideas travelled impressively. That traffic was largely sea-borne, carrying Buddhism, kingdoms and populations to Southeast Asia. Those links endured. If our ancients could do it, why can't the present generations? But internal resolve, instead of the periodically dusted off placards, will be needed for that.

 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

Look east is a two-decade-old placard!
Rajesh | Mon Jul 1 11:07:08 2013
Sir, I agree with you that your story is factually correct, however we will never look east till our businesses and factories and local consumption are reduced to ground zero. Our Industrialists are greedy enough not to share business and development with others around the world, our politicians will never open up East India till the loot available there in the vastly undeveloped lands is not fully exploited by their likes. Politicians use Locals, Bangladeshis and Military to make it impossible for Indians from other parts of India to settle in the Far east. How can we start Industries in the far east the land mafias who have invested so heavily in the Northern and western regions will lose out and then who will oil the Political apparatus for elections??? Mumbai Delhi Industrial Corridor has again delayed the urge to industrialize the East and connect with the East Asia by another 50 years. There is a long way to go.India will never integrate with the world economy for its own greed. India will loose out to other economies and will never be able to catch up with China or Japan or Germany.


To Look East, India must first transform its northeast
Vissionary | Thu Jun 13 11:04:23 2013
Really hope AAI comes up with an world class international terminal (in the line of Hyderabad, Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi Airports) in AGARTALA with all modern amenities! With growing economic linkage between INDIA and other ASIAN countries (latest being PM's visit to Japan and Thailand) as part of INDIA's LOOK-EAST POLICY,it hardly leaves any room for imagination - the role AGARTALA going to play in near future being the hub of international trade. And SMOOTH and AROMATIC flow of INTERNATIONAL and DOMESTIC travelers (includes businessman, tourists, patients, students) will hold key to fully realize potential of LOOK-EAST policy envisioned by INDIA's leadership. IMPOSSIBLE - just means I AM POSSIBLE! If India need to catch up with developed part of the world,the most strategically placed Northeast (especially TRIPURA) need to be made into a developed region in the shortest possible time! I strongly believe TRIPURA govt (in close co-ordination with Center,other concerned dignitaries & all corporate visionaries) can certainly achieve this sooner rather than late,which would definitely give its people a better employment opportunities,a better healthcare,a better access to quality education and a quality lifestyle!


 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing?
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter