SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Small Businesses And Trade Fairs - A Winning Partnership  • India unveils Taxonomy of Green Steel in big step to decarbonise production  • 69 pc of $1 trillion FDI inflow into India came in last 10 years: Govt  • Commercial-level air taxis arriving soon in South Korea  • Govt inks Rs 13,500 crore deal for 12 Sukhoi fighter jets with HAL in big boost to self-reliance 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

China.9.Thmb.jpg A new word for Chinese diplomacy -- 'duplimacy'?

Madeinchina.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» India seeking mutually beneficial FTA with EU: Piyush Goyal
» India's nuclear power capacity has doubled in last 10 years: Jitendra Singh
» $2.2 trillion in infra investment to help India become $7 trillion economy by 2030
» Women now own 20.5 pc of MSMEs in India, startups surge in tier 2 and 3 cities
» Higher industrial activity spurs power demand in November: Report
Ravi M. Khanna | 24 Jan, 2012
"China wants to develop long-term friendship and cooperation with India." So said the Chinese official who held border talks with Indian officials this week. He also predicted a "golden period for India-China relations" in the near future. What he did not say, but sceptics like me heard him say between the lines, is that all this is possible only if it is done on China's terms.

What we heard between the lines is never uttered by China, but only demonstrated by its actions. So the real dichotomy lies between what China "says" and what China "does".

Just days before Chinese State Councillor Dai Bingguo's statement, the Chinese government had already shown that China will never budge from its policy towards the border issue. The Chinese government denied visa to an Indian Air Force officer who was to go as a member of the Indian military delegation to China on the ground that he was from Arunachal Pradesh, the Indian state claimed by China. This led to India scaling down its delegation from the original 30 members to 15.

At one point China even took a subtle step to show that it can, if it wants, consider Kashmiris, not as Indian citizens, but citizens of "Kashmir" by not stamping the visa on their Indian passports but issuing it on a separate paper.

These kind of moves by China are not limited only towards India. This is the underlying character of their dubious diplomacy, or shall we call it Chinese "duplimacy".

Last year, even Washington had to face Chinese "duplimacy". Just hours before then US Defence Secretary Robert Gates arrived in Beijing to improve military ties between the two powers, the Chinese military engaged in an unusual show of force by staging the test flight of their top secret new stealth fighter jet J-20. That was China's action. The words from China came later when President Hu Jintao and other civilian leaders gave Gates the impression that they were unaware of the test.

Some China experts feel that China shows this kind of arrogance because its adventures in the past against other nations were not nipped in the bud but were rather tolerated. Since there were no consequences, China keeps on flaunting its power in Asia.

In fact, ever since 1949 when China came under Communist rule, its history has been replete with aggressions.

In the Korean war, China sent in one million troops to defend North Korea against UN coalition forces. Then it attacked and took over an independent Tibetan kingdom. In 1962, China invaded and tried to get control of Indian territory. Seven years later it tried to invade across the Soviet border in the Damanskiy Island area. Then came the war of aggression against Vietnam in 1979.

But if you go by what China says, they are a peaceful nation that has no history of aggression. The fact is that by action they have always been the bully in the area, and their statements have always tried to portray them as a victim.

Anyway, history tells us that Beijing would not hesitate in using military force to secure its territory if the Chinese leaders believed such action is necessary. Most countries have wondered why China was rapidly building up its armed forces without acknowledging it.

The Chinese official who held border talks this week with India also rejected the notion of any rivalry between China and India. Now this is another statement that fits into the mould of China's "duplimacy". What he said can also mean that China considers it so far ahead of India that there isn't any rivalry to speak of. Does China think that India is naïve enough to be lulled into a slumber of complacency and really believe that there is no rivalry?

So may be what the Chinese official really meant was that it can be a "golden period for India-China relations", provided India shuns the rivalry and accepts China as the "daddy" in Asia.

But, apparently, India can never forget how it was bitten by the "Hindi Cheeni bhai bhai" bug in the Nehru era. So it should be twice shy and doubly prepared.

* Ravi M. Khanna is a longtime South Asia observer. He has also headed the South Asia Desk in the Voice of America Newsroom in Washington and published a book called "TV News Writing Made Easy for Newcomers". He can be reached at ravitheactor@yahoo.com)
* The views expressed by the author in this feature are entirely his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of SME Times.

 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

history is not what you read in books
kumar | Wed Jan 25 15:07:29 2012
i seems you are a bad historian, if you read properly will clarify a lot Kashmir (please read again the last agreement signed by Indian government in 1948 and ratified in 1972 and identity for the territory in undrafted agreement. Arunachal Pradesh : since China doesn't recognise the state as part of India, it will be unappropriate for a resident of that state to represent India at any representation to China, as accepting that representation can be read as accepting residents of Arunachal Pradesh as citizen of India which is not in accordance with the state external affair policy.


Fact vs. Words
RedWhiteBlue | Tue Jan 24 06:03:13 2012
IF China were aggressive, there would not be an India today. Keep that firmly in your mind. Back in the last conflict, there was NOTHING between the PLA and New Delhi. Instead of wet dreaming about revenge, if our Indian friends would spend more time solving the many problems of society, may hap India's GDP would not only be 1/4 that of China's. Have you noticed that despite all the talk about India being an "ally", the Yanks are investing in China?


 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing?
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter