SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Apparel industry urges Piyush Goyal to regulate cotton yarn exports amid price surge  • Govt kicks off preparations for Union Budget 2027-28, pre-Budget meetings from Oct 12  • Willing to negotiate with US but remains wary: Iranian President  • Kiren Rijiju to lead Indian delegation at 65th anniversary of NAM summit in Belgrade  • India-Kyrgyzstan relations witnessing a renaissance, PM Modi visit to open new avenues: Tourism Minister 
Last updated: 17 Oct, 2024  

Supreme Court SC upholds constitutional validity of Section 6A of Citizenship Act

Supreme Court
   Top Stories
» Govt kicks off preparations for Union Budget 2027-28, pre-Budget meetings from Oct 12
» ‘Why India, why now’: FM Sitharaman pitches India as global investment and manufacturing hub
» ChatGPT to run ads in India for users of Free, Go tiers
» Indian SMEs in Qatar can channel for $10 bn investment pledge into growth-oriented projects: Envoy
» India, Morocco conclude 7th Joint Commission meeting; agree to boost trade and investments
IANS | 17 Oct, 2024

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. 

A Constitution Bench, headed by CJI D. Y. Chandrachud, was dealing with a clutch of petitions challenging the vires of Section 6A, which was inserted to give effect to the Assam Accord and formed the basis of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam in 2019.

In December last year, the five-judge Bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant, M.M. Sundresh, J. B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, reserved its decision after hearing oral arguments from both sides.

The majority upheld the constitutional validity of the impugned provision, while, Justice Pardiwala, in his minority opinion, struck down Section 6A of the Citizenship Act with prospective effect.

During the hearing, the Supreme Court had asked the Union government to inform it about the administrative steps taken to prevent the inflow of illegal immigrants into Indian territory in northeastern states, particularly from Assam.

It had called for a common affidavit from the Union and Assam governments about the number of Bangladeshi immigrants granted citizenship in Assam between January 1, 1966, and March 25, 1971, under section 6A (2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

In response, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that illegal immigrants entered the country in a clandestine and surreptitious manner, and therefore, it is not possible to collect accurate data on such people.

Earlier, the top court had observed that the primary question in the case was "whether Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 suffers from any constitutional infirmity".

The amended Section 6A provided that "all persons of Indian origin who came before the 1st day of January 1966 to Assam from the specified territory (including such of those whose names were included in the electoral rolls used for the General Election to the House of the People held in 1967) and who have been ordinarily resident in Assam since the dates of their entry into Assam shall be deemed to be citizens of India as from the 1st day of January 1966".

 
Print the Page
Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
₹95.3
₹93.6
UK Pound
₹127.7
₹123.7
Euro
₹110.65
₹106.9
Japanese Yen ₹59.75 ₹57.9
As on 24 Jun, 2026
  Daily Poll
What’s your biggest challenge with the 45-day payment rule?
 Corporates canceling our orders
 Clients demanding longer credit anyway
 Strained business relationships
 Filing complaints kills future work
 No issues, cash flow has improved
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter