SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • India embraces cashless revolution in last 11 years: Nirmala Sitharaman  • Indian stock market opens in green, IT and PSU banks lead  • India now has 1.76 lakh registered startups, 118 unicorns: FM Sitharaman  • Centre’s wheat procurement at MSP rises to three-year high  • RBI reduces inflation forecast to 3.7 pc for 2025-26 
Last updated: 17 Dec, 2023  

Delhi.High.Court.9_thumb.jpg Delhi HC rejects restraining order on BharatPe's Ashneer Grover regarding unpaid shares

Delhi.High.Court.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» India embraces cashless revolution in last 11 years: Nirmala Sitharaman
» Indian stock market opens in green, IT and PSU banks lead
» RBI booster: EMIs, tenure set to come down for home loan borrowers
» RBI cuts repo rate by 50 basis points to 5.5 pc, changes policy stance to neutral
» Sensex, Nifty end in green ahead of RBI MPC decision
IANS | 17 Dec, 2023
The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to grant a restraining order against BharatPe's former Managing Director, Ashneer Grover, in connection with a case filed by fintech company's co-founder Shashvat Nakrani over claims of unpaid shares.

Justice Sachin Datta rejected the interim application filed by Nakrani in his lawsuit against Grover, seeking to prevent him from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party rights in the unpaid shares.

The court clarified that it had declined the interim injunction but directed Grover to provide prior intimation to Nakrani, if and when, he decides to transfer or alienate the shares in question.

Representing Nakrani, senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul had earlier contended that in case filed by co-founder Bhavik Koladiya on the same lines, the court has issued summons and has asked Grover to not create any third-party rights in respect of the shares in BharatPe.

Kaul had said that it is Grover's stand that he has paid for the shares in cash.

The court had noted that the case was filed about five years after the shares were stated to have been transferred while Kaul argued for an interim relief.

Lawyer Giriraj Subramanium, Grover's counsel, was questioned by Judge Datta if he was prepared to make a statement that no third-party rights would be created over the shares. To this, Subramanium said that he has instructions not to make such a statement.

"Plaintiff has been heard at some length in the interim relief application. Counsel for the defendant says they don't want to file a response to the application," the court said.

Koladiya's suit seeking to reclaim trasferred shares remains pending before another bench of the High Court.

In the case, when the court had earlier asked Grover to not create any third-party rights over the shares, he had informed the court that subject to further directions from the court, he will not make any third-party interest in the 16,110 shares that Koladiya transferred to him and in any rights that accrue to him as a consequence thereof.

A single-bench judge Justice Prateek Jalan had ordered that Grover will be bound by his statement and directed him to file the undertaking. The bench had noted: "D1 (Grover) is bound to the aforesaid statement and is directed to file an undertaking."

Nakrani and Koladiya founded the fintech company in 2017. In 2018, Grover joined the company as the third co-founder.

 
Print the Page
Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Do you think Indian businesses will be negatively affected by Trump's America First Policy?
 Yes
 No
 Can't Say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter