IANS | 19 Dec, 2023
A consumer court in Bengaluru has held LG Electronics and its
authorised seller Girias Investment Private Ltd liable for failure to
refund or replace a defective dishwasher.
The decision by the III
Additional Bengaluru Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission came on a plea by E. Venkataramana, a resident of Hebbal
Kempapura.
The commission held that, the opposite parties, LG
Electronics and seller Girias Investment Private Ltd, are directed to
refund the cost of the subject of Rs 56,000 with interest rate of 9 per
cent per annum from the date of its purchase till realisation.
In
addition, they are also pay compensation of Rs 10,000 towards mental
agony and Rs 5,000 towards cost of the litigation to the complainant.
The
complainant requested the commission to direct the LG Electronics and
Girias Investment Private Ltd to refund the price of dishwasher, at Rs
56,000, with interest at the rate of 24 per cent per annum from Dec 31,
2020 till the realisation.
The petitioner also demanded
compensation of Rs 2 lakh for deficiency of service, Rs 5 lakh for
mental agony, and Rs 25,000 towards the cost of the litigation as he
highlighted the deficiency of service and unfair trade practice.
The
Commission has also asked the LG Electronics and its authorised seller
Girias Investment Private Ltd to comply with the order within 45 days.
The
complainant had purchased LG Dishwasher on Dec 31, 2020 and it was
delivered on Jan 4, 2021. Within a short time, the machine started
giving trouble. The complainant made a complaint to the customer care
and they attended and figured out a problem with the motherboard and
asked to contact the manager. Thereafter, the complainant approached
several company representatives but to no avail.
The complainant
was issued a legal notice on March 24, 2021. But, the LG and Girias did
not reply. Thereafter, till filing of this complaint, there was no
response.
The Bengaluru bench comprising Commission President K.
Shivarama, members Chandrashekar S Noola and Rekha Sayannavar passed the
order on November 29.
The case was filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019.