|
|
FDI: SC says policy must be approved by parliament
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
SME Times News Bureau | 06 Nov, 2012
Hearing a plea against FDI in retail, the Supreme Court Monday said if
the government formulates a policy which is not approved by parliament
then it would be doing so at its own peril.
"The executive is
mandated to rule. It is for it to decide how to go about the governance
and if it violates the constitution then judiciary would step in," said
the apex court bench of Justice R.M. Lodha and Justice Anil R. Dave.
The
court's remark followed the government's statement that it had effected
the necessary amendments in Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) regulations to facilitate multi-brand
foreign direct investment (FDI) in the retail sector.
The judges
said the courts should be circumspect in interfering with the economic
policies of the government. However, they said they were not suggesting
that the entire economic policies of the government were beyond judicial
review.
"We have not said that the entire economic policy (of
the government) was beyond judicial review but court should be extremely
low and slow in interfering (with economic policy) unless it violates
values which flow from the constitution and does not conform to the
music and spirit of the constitution," Justice Lodha said.
The
court said this when NGO Swadeshi Jagran Foundation (SJF) assailed the
policy of permitting multi-brand FDI in the retail sector saying that it
was contrary to the principles of social and economic justice.
SJF's
counsel told the court that permitting FDI in retail would lead to
unemployment and permitting it in the Indian market would be contrary to
the recommendations of a parliamentary committee.
Not granting
its plea to be impleaded in the case, the court said recommendations of
the parliamentary committee were more in nature of an advisory, the
economic policy was the sole prerogative of the government which was
ultimately answerable to parliament for its actions.
The
"executive (government) must listen to parliament. It is answerable to
parliament and all its actions are subject to scrutiny by parliament",
the court said.
Pointing out that the constitution clearly
demarcated the jurisdiction of the executive, the legislature and the
judiciary, Justice Lodha said: "What is good for the country and in the
best interest of the people can be decided by the government which is
mandated to govern the country."
The court described as
"premature and unfounded" petitioner advocate Manohar Lal Sharma's
"apprehensions" that the government would not place before parliament
the amendment to the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or issue of
Security by a person Resident outside India) (Fourth Amendment)
Regulations, 2012, and the Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) (Third
Amendment) Regulation, 2012, and the RBI notification providing
multi-band retail trading.
The court would next hear the matter Jan 22.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
66.20
|
64.50 |
UK Pound
|
87.50
|
84.65 |
Euro
|
78.25
|
75.65 |
Japanese
Yen |
58.85 |
56.85 |
As on 13 Aug, 2022 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|