SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Adani Group to invest Rs 57,575 crore in Odisha  • 'Dollar Distancing' finally happening? Time for India to pitch Rupee as credible alternative: SBI Ecowrap  • 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh  • 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'  • LinkedIn lays off entire global events marketing team: Report 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

pizza-hutTHMB.jpg Pizza Hut to pay $10.8 mn in case of delivery driver collision

pizza-hut.jpg
   Top Stories
» 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh
» 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'
» Tripura exported over 9K tonnes of pineapples in 2 years
» CPI inflation eases to 6.71% in July, IIP falls to 12.3%
» Rupee depreciates 12 paise to close at 79.64 against US dollar
PR Newswire | 31 Jul, 2010

SAN DIEGO: A San Diego Superior Court jury has returned a verdict against Pizza Hut, Inc. for a total of $10.8 million. The case arose out of a November 9, 2008 collision between a Pizza Hut delivery driver and a mother and daughter on Clairemont Drive in San Diego, California. During the event, the delivery driver, 18 year old Nicole Fisk, drifted across lanes, and collided head on with the vehicle containing Olena Marie Novak and her daughter Shari Marie Novak. Olena, 87 years old at the time of the accident suffered a severe cervical fracture. Her daughter, Shari , suffered a catastrophic and permanent brain injury. She today requires 24 hour care.

After the crash, Pizza Hut claimed its delivery driver had suffered a seizure caused by previously undiagnosed epilepsy, causing the collision. "Sudden medical emergency" is a defense to negligence under California law.

Attorneys representing the Novak family countered that Pizza Hut's driver knew she had a previous medical condition, and that Pizza Hut should have done more to ensure she could safely work as a professional driver. The driver, Nicole Fisk, was only 18 years old at the time, had held a drivers license for only 3 months, and had a history of "staring spells" and "blackout" episodes prior to the incident.

The jury agreed, finding both that there was no "sudden medical emergency" excusing the driver's conduct. The jury awarded Olena Novak a total of $ 2.2 million and Shari Novak $8.6 million.

John Gomez of the Gomez Law Firm, attorney for the Novak family, stated, "This case was about corporate responsibility. Pizza Hut refused to accept its responsibility and the jury properly imposed it." Co-counsel Joseph Lavelle, of Wertz McDade Wallace Moot & Brower added, "Today this jury made the roads safer for all of us. Hopefully from now on, corporate employers will do what they need to do to make sure they hire only safe drivers to get beyond the wheel daily as part of their job." Both firms represented the family at trial.

SOURCE The Gomez Law Firm

 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
66.20
64.50
UK Pound
87.50
84.65
Euro
78.25
75.65
Japanese Yen 58.85 56.85
As on 13 Aug, 2022
  Daily Poll
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
» GIC Re's revenue from obligatory cession threatened(1)
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter