SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Apparel industry urges Piyush Goyal to regulate cotton yarn exports amid price surge  • Govt kicks off preparations for Union Budget 2027-28, pre-Budget meetings from Oct 12  • Willing to negotiate with US but remains wary: Iranian President  • Kiren Rijiju to lead Indian delegation at 65th anniversary of NAM summit in Belgrade  • India-Kyrgyzstan relations witnessing a renaissance, PM Modi visit to open new avenues: Tourism Minister 
Last updated: 20 Nov, 2023  

Court.9.Thmb.jpg State sucking blood of poor unemployed youth: Himachal HC

Court.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» Govt kicks off preparations for Union Budget 2027-28, pre-Budget meetings from Oct 12
» ‘Why India, why now’: FM Sitharaman pitches India as global investment and manufacturing hub
» ChatGPT to run ads in India for users of Free, Go tiers
» Indian SMEs in Qatar can channel for $10 bn investment pledge into growth-oriented projects: Envoy
» India, Morocco conclude 7th Joint Commission meeting; agree to boost trade and investments
IANS | 20 Nov, 2023
Himachal Pradesh High Court on Monday passed an order saying that the state is trying to save money by sucking blood of poor helpless unemployed youth and compelling them to accept any term imposed upon them on seeing a ray of hope for chance to earn something, not for dignified livelihood but for survival.

The order was passed by the division bench of Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Sandeep Sharma.

The state has formulated and implemented grant-in-aid to Parent Teacher Association (PTA) Rules of 2006 for providing grant-in-aid to the PTA teachers serving in schools.

However, vide communication dated August 27, 2007, benefit thereof was declared inadmissible to the PTA teachers serving situated in the area of municipal corporations, municipal committees and nagar panchayats.

The court observed that despite repeated directions by the courts to the state to provide regular teachers in the schools, the state, irrespective of persons in power, has failed to follow the directions and to appoint regular teachers.

In compelling circumstances, the PTAs are constrained to engage teacher(s) to save the future of children.

The court found the PTA teachers serving in rural areas or urban areas are one of the same class and the classification amongst them is not intelligible.

The PTA teachers in urban and rural areas are appointed for identical reasons and perform identical jobs with equal degree of accountability and responsibility.

The judges found the classification of PTA teachers discriminatory and one more example of exploitative policies formulated and adopted by the state.

 
Print the Page
Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
₹95.3
₹93.6
UK Pound
₹127.7
₹123.7
Euro
₹110.65
₹106.9
Japanese Yen ₹59.75 ₹57.9
As on 24 Jun, 2026
  Daily Poll
What’s your biggest challenge with the 45-day payment rule?
 Corporates canceling our orders
 Clients demanding longer credit anyway
 Strained business relationships
 Filing complaints kills future work
 No issues, cash flow has improved
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter