|
|
|
'Reduced to mockery': Calcutta HC judge questions handling of Narada case
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
SME Times News Bureau | 28 May, 2021
A day when the five-member bench of the Calcutta High
Court granted bail to heavyweight Trinamool Congress leaders accused in
Narada bribery case, a letter surfaced from a judge who strongly
objected to manner in which the transfer plea filed by the CBI in the
case was listed before a division bench as a writ petition.
Justice
Arindam Sinha, a sitting judge of the High Court who has been part of
the Narada hearing right from the beginning, wrote a letter to Acting
Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal, criticising the manner in which the court
entertained the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) plea for staying
the lower court's ruling that granted bail to the arrested politicians.
"Our conduct is unbecoming of the majesty the high court
commands. We have been reduced to a mockery," Justice Sinha wrote in his
letter.
In his two-page letter, a copy of which is available
with IANS, Justice Sinha wrote that the Appellate Side Rules of the High
Court, which govern the procedure of listing such matters, require that
a motion seeking transfer either on the civil or the criminal side, has
to be heard by a single judge.
The transfer petition under
Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was taken up by a division
bench of the High Court on May 17 based on an email sent by the CBI to
the court and a mentioning made by Additional Solicitor General Y.J.
Dastoor. "However, the first Division Bench took up the matter treating
it to be a writ petition. Even a writ petition under Article 228 of the
Constitution should have gone to the single judge having determination,"
he said.
The communication (sent by the CBI to High Court on May
17) could not have been treated as a writ petition simply because no
substantial question as to the interpretation of law has been raised, he
added. "The mob factor may be a ground on merits for adjudication of
the motion but could the first division bench have taken it up and
continue to hear it as a writ petition is the first question," the
letter said.
The judge also questioned the manner in which the
division bench stayed the bail granted by the special court to the
accused on May 17.
"Whether the High Court exercising power in
the matter of transfer of a criminal case at this stage on its own
initiative could have passed the order of stay is the second question,"
the judge opined. He questioned the high court's stay on the lower
court's bail order, saying that the CBI's application was not supported
by an affidavit.
He also criticized the way the division bench
was not available the next day and did not entrust another bench to hear
the matter. "The public were presented with the situation of the high
court having interfered with the liberty of their elected
representatives and then it would not be available for that day to
adjudicate on their liberty," the letter said.
He also said that
the two-judge division bench had a difference of opinion, with one
favouring the granting of interim bail and the other not, but the
procedures for such situations were not followed. In case of difference
within a bench, a third judge's opinion is usually taken, Sinha wrote,
adding that it had not been done in this case.
"When the judges
on a division bench differ on any point or issue, the same is referred
to a third learned judge for opinion. In the premises, Rule 1 in Chapter
II of Appellate Side Rules do not apply, Chapter VII provides for
references to a full bench. Such reference arises when the view taken by
a division bench is inconsistent with the view taken by another
division bench," it was stated.
Justice Sinha, therefore,
requested all judges to salvage the situation by taking suitable steps
including convening of full court, if necessary, for "reaffirming the
sanctity of our Rules and our unwritten code of conduct".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
66.20
|
64.50 |
UK Pound
|
87.50
|
84.65 |
Euro
|
78.25
|
75.65 |
Japanese
Yen |
58.85 |
56.85 |
As on 13 Aug, 2022 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|