SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Adani Group to invest Rs 57,575 crore in Odisha  • 'Dollar Distancing' finally happening? Time for India to pitch Rupee as credible alternative: SBI Ecowrap  • 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh  • 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'  • LinkedIn lays off entire global events marketing team: Report 
Last updated: 20 Jul, 2018  

Chidambaram THMB Aircel-Maxis case: Chidambaram approved investment beyond his mandate, says CBI

Chidambaram
   Top Stories
» 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh
» 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'
» Tripura exported over 9K tonnes of pineapples in 2 years
» CPI inflation eases to 6.71% in July, IIP falls to 12.3%
» Rupee depreciates 12 paise to close at 79.64 against US dollar
SME Times News Bureau | 20 Jul, 2018
The CBI listed on Thursday former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram as an accused in the Aircel-Maxis case, alleging that he had power to approve foreign investments only up to Rs 600 crore but he cleared Rs 3,200-crore investment without referring the matter to CCEA.

The revelation was made in the charge-sheet the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed in a special court here that listed the matter for hearing on July 31.

The investigation agency filed the charge-sheet against Chidambaram, his son Karti Chidambaram and 16 others.

Among the 16 others are former Union Secretary for Economic Affairs Ashok Kumar Jha, then Additional Secretary Ashok Chawla, two serving IAS officers -- Joint Secretary Kumar Sanjay Krishna and Director Deepak Kumar Singh and an Under Secretary Ram Sharan, and private persons A. Palaniappan, Tatparanandam Krishnan, Augustus Ralph Marshal, S. Bhaskaraman and V. Srinivasan.

Besides, the charge-sheet also mentioned the names of companies - M/S Chess Management Services Holding Ltd; Astro All Asia Network PLC., Malaysia; M/S Maxis Mobile SDN. BHD., Malaysia; M/S Bumi Armada Berhad, Malaysia; Bumi Armada Navigation SDN. BHD., Malaysia; and M/S Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt Ltd of Chennai.

A CBI official said that the charge-sheet was filed against Chidambaram for "misuse of official position". As Finance Minister he approved the investment at his level without sending the file to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).

"He knew everything from the beginning," the official claimed.

"As per the government policy and FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board) guidelines, as applicable in 2006, where the total foreign inflow is Rs 600 crore and above, the competent authority was CCEA to give approval for foreign investment," the official said.

He said that as the total inflow of foreign exchange involved in the acquisition of shares of Aircel Ltd was Rs 3,520 crore, only the CCEA was competent authority to give FIPB approval.

"But the approval was given by then Finance Minister. It was shown on file that Aircel was being purchased for Rs 180 crore with 18 crore shares of Rs 10 face value each. However, they didn't show the premium (on these shares) of Rs 3,200 crore," the official said.

The CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigated Karti Chidambaram's alleged role in getting FIPB clearance for the Aircel-Maxis deal in 2006 when his father was the Union Finance Minister.

He also claimed that all the officials named in the charge-sheet actively discussed the matter of the FIPB.

A CBI source said when the Maxis applied to the FIPB for making the investment, in its initial application Rs 3,200 crore was mentioned. "But when the file came for approval in the Finance Ministry, only Rs 180 crore was shown as the foreign investment," the source said.

The agency official also claimed that two firms -- Chess Management and Advantage Startegic Consultancy -- controlled by Karti Chidambaram received two illegal payments of Rs 26 lakh and Rs 87 lakh.

He said that on March 13, 2006, Aircel applied to the FIPB, and on March 29, 2006, an invoice for Rs 26 lakh was raised by Karti Chidambaram's firm to the Aircel. The Aircel made payment to the Advantage Strategic Consultancy through cheque on April 1, 2006.

The official also claimed that when the agency officials asked for the purpose of the payment of Rs 26 lakh, the Karti Chidambaram's firm replied that it was for market survey.

Disclosing the details of the Rs 87 lakh payment made to Karti Chidambaram's other firm -- Chess Management -- by the Maxis, the official said as per the details given by them, it was meant for providing a software named ELCM.

"However, when the agencies asked for a copy of the software, they were not able to furnish any," the official said.

"And all the payments were made during the same period to the Karti Chidambaram's firm," he said.

On August 29, 2014, the CBI had filed a charge-sheet in the case alleging that between July 2004 and September 2008, Dayanidhi Maran, as a Minister in the UPA-I government, used his influence to help Malaysian businessman Krishnan buy Aircel by coercing its owner Sivasankaran to part with his stake.

Sivasankaran alleged that Maran favoured the Krishnan-owned Maxis Group in the takeover of his company. In return, he alleged, Maxis made investments through Astro Network, a sister concern, in Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL), said to be owned by the Maran family.

However, a special court had dropped charges against former Communications Minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanithi and others in the alleged kickback of Rs 742 crore in the Aircel-Maxis deal, saying the "perception or suspicion" was not backed by concrete evidence.
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
66.20
64.50
UK Pound
87.50
84.65
Euro
78.25
75.65
Japanese Yen 58.85 56.85
As on 13 Aug, 2022
  Daily Poll
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
» GIC Re's revenue from obligatory cession threatened(1)
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter