SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Centre exempts nuclear power goods from customs duty for past imports  • Indian markets trade higher despite West Asia tensions  • Corporate lending grows at fastest pace in Q1: BOK  • Adani Ports secures 10-year marine services for Argentina's 1st LNG export to India  • Indian auto industry sees best-ever May retail sales at over 25.3 lakh units 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

Sebi.9.Thmb.jpg SEBI at fault in Sahara case, SC told

Supreme.Court.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» Centre exempts nuclear power goods from customs duty for past imports
» Indian markets trade higher despite West Asia tensions
» Sensex, Nifty open 1 pc lower amid West Asia tensions, weak global cues
» India clocks robust 7.7 pc GDP growth in 2025-26, Q4 growth at 7.8 pc
» RBI keeps repo rate unchanged at 5.25 pc, maintains ‘Neutral’ stance
SME Times News Bureau | 31 May, 2012
The Supreme Court was Wednesday informed that the stock market regulator could not have taken up the issue of Sahara group of companies mopping up Rs.17,400 crore through debentures and ordered their refund.

Senior counsel Fali Nariman, appearing for Sahara India Real Estate Corp, told the apex court bench of Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice J.S. Khehar that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) took up the matter even though there was no complaint from any investor.

The court was told that the investors in the optional fully convertible debentures were getting in time what was due to them.

Nariman told this to the court in the course of a hearing on appeals filed by Sahara India Real Estate Corp and Sahara Housing Investment Corp.

The two firms had challenged the Securities Appellate Tribunal's (SAT) award last year directing them to refund Rs.17,400 crore they had collected from investors.

There was no complaint by any of the investors who had the right to initiate action if aggrieved, Nariman said.

The senior counsel told the court that the SEBI wanted details on the investors and that was given to it in a CD.

Justice Radhakrishnan asked the senior counsel why was the Sahara company not listed in the stock market. Nariman told the court that it was under no compulsion to do so.

The judge told the senior counsel that the court knew that it was not compulsory for a company to get listed but the court wanted to know the reason why it decided against it. Nariman offered to address the court's query later.
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
₹94.2
₹92.5
UK Pound
₹128.85
₹124.8
Euro
₹112.2
₹108.45
Japanese Yen ₹59.85 ₹58
As on 06 May, 2026
  Daily Poll
What is the biggest war impact on MSMEs?
 Export Disruption
 Raw Material Spike
 Freight Cost Surge
 Payment Delays
 Currency Volatility
 All
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter