|
|
|
Decision in Oracle's favour will limit consumers' freedom: Google
|
|
|
|
Top Stories |
|
|
|
|
IANS | 08 Aug, 2020
As Google and Cloud major Oracle look forward to the US Supreme Court
hearing on October 7 into a decade-long copyright legal battle, the
search engine giant has filed a supplemental brief to augment its
position, saying a decision in Oracle's favour would limit consumers'
freedom to use technologies on a range of devices.
The
supplemental brief was filed this week in a long-standing case where
Oracle has blamed Google for "copyright infringement" where it "copied
Java APIs to build the Android smartphone operating system".
After Oracle acquired Java in 2010, it sued Google for using its software interfaces.
In
2018, an appeals court in the US ruled that Google violated copyright
laws when it used Oracle's open-source Java software to build the
Android platform.
In a fresh blog post this week, Kent Walker who
is SVP of Global Affairs at Google pitches for "interoperability" that
has let software developers build on each other's work.
"The
interoperability of open software interfaces is what lets different
technologies like apps work together on a variety of devices and
platforms," he stressed.
"Our legal case with Oracle turns on our
belief that interoperability has been good for innovation, good for
developers, and good for consumers".
Oracle initially sought $9 billion when it filed the lawsuit in 2010.
Claiming
that it should receive $475 million in damages in addition to $8.8
billion relating to "profits apportioned to infringed Java copyrights",
Oracle accused Google of illegally copying a key part of the Java
platform into its Android operating system.
According to Google,
with smartphone apps now common, "we sometimes forget how hard it once
was for developers to build apps across a wide range of different
platforms".
The Supreme Court has heard from 250 leading computer scientists, businesses, and software developers in the case.
The
Court recently asked for additional information about how courts should
respect a jury's decision that a given use (like the reuse of software
interfaces) constitutes allowable fair use.
According to Walker, a decision in Oracle's favour would limit consumers' freedom to use technologies on a range of devices.
"It
would upend the way developers have always used software interfaces,
locking them into existing platforms and giving copyright owners new
power to control the building blocks of new technologies," he argued.
Java was developed by tech firm Sun Microsystems which was acquired by Oracle in 2010.
In
2012, the companies took the issue to court but the jury was unable to
determine whether Google used Java application programming interfaces
(APIs) fairly.
Two years later, an appeals court overturned the ruling and raised the question on Google's "fair use" of Oracle's technology.
In
2016, it was ruled that Google's use of Oracle's APIs was legal under
the copyright law's fair use doctrine, "which allows the free use of
copyrighted material under specific circumstances".
Oracle
appealed the decision and the jury ruled in favour of the Cloud major.
Google last year filed a petition in the US Supreme Court to review the
decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customs Exchange Rates |
Currency |
Import |
Export |
US Dollar
|
66.20
|
64.50 |
UK Pound
|
87.50
|
84.65 |
Euro
|
78.25
|
75.65 |
Japanese
Yen |
58.85 |
56.85 |
As on 13 Aug, 2022 |
|
|
Daily Poll |
|
|
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations |
|
|
|
|
|
Commented Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|