SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Adani Group to invest Rs 57,575 crore in Odisha  • 'Dollar Distancing' finally happening? Time for India to pitch Rupee as credible alternative: SBI Ecowrap  • 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh  • 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'  • LinkedIn lays off entire global events marketing team: Report 
Last updated: 31 Jan, 2015  

Vedanta.Thmb.jpg Natarajan's claim on Vedanta sparks political debate

Jayanthi.Natarajan.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh
» 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'
» Tripura exported over 9K tonnes of pineapples in 2 years
» CPI inflation eases to 6.71% in July, IIP falls to 12.3%
» Rupee depreciates 12 paise to close at 79.64 against US dollar
SME Times News Bureau | 31 Jan, 2015
Former union minister Jayanthi Natarajan's claim that Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi put pressure on her to reject the green clearance to Vedanta's mining project in Odisha Friday sparked a political debate in Bhubaneswar.

While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Biju Janata Dal (BJD) lashed out at the Gandhi family for influencing the government's decision, the Congress tried to defend itself stating the intervention was meant to protect interest of 'Dangaria Kondh' tribes in Niyamgiri hills of Kalahandi district.

"The statement of Natarajan exposed the conspiracy of UPA to destroy the economy of Odisha. Vedanta came here to set up an industry and create jobs in Odisha. But, the cancellation of the forest clearance was a big jolt to the company and it almost came to closure," said BJD spokesperson Rabinarayan Nanda.

Senior BJP leader Suresh Pujari said it was wellknown that the first family of the Congress party was intervening in the government.

"We all know that Rahul and Sonia Gandhi were using extra-constitutional authorities in the government and used to influence the government decisions. The statement of Natarajan only vindicated it," said Pujari.

However, the Congress leaders became defensive and admitted that there could have been pressure from Rahul to deny permission to Vedanta to mine bauxite in the Niyamgiri hills.

"Rahulji had already taken a stand to protect interests of tribals under any circumstance. So, I think Rahulji might have spoken to her about the Niyamgiri issue. I see nothing wrong in it," said former Congress MP Pradeep Majhi.

Majhi said the Congress vice-president had visited the hills here and assured the tribals he would defend their rights in Delhi.

"The Supreme Court also asked the tribal affairs ministry to hold gram sabhas (village meetings) in Niyamgiri area to take views of the local residents. The tribals also rejected the mining proposal of Vedanta to mine on the hills," added Majhi.

In her resignation from the party, the former union minister of forest and environment wrote to the Congress high command that she received specific requests from the Congress vice-president on environmental clearances and she consequently rejected big-ticket projects despite pressure from her Cabinet colleagues seeking approval.

The ministry had declined to give Vedanta the stage-2 forest clearance to extract bauxite from Niyamgiri hills Aug 24, 2010.

Rahul Gandhi, who claimed to be a 'sipahi' (soldier) of the tribals, visited the site at Niyamgiri Aug 26, 2010.
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
66.20
64.50
UK Pound
87.50
84.65
Euro
78.25
75.65
Japanese Yen 58.85 56.85
As on 13 Aug, 2022
  Daily Poll
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
» GIC Re's revenue from obligatory cession threatened(1)
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter